The Liver Meeting 2021-Academic Debates

Video Transcription

Video Summary

The Liver Meeting's academic debates in 2021 showcased teams from the University of Michigan and Duke University discussing whether intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be a standard indication for liver transplantation or a contraindication. Michigan argued for transplantation with strict tumor selection criteria, while Duke focused on poor survival rates post-transplant. Panelists questioned both teams on data validity, patient selection, and outcomes, stressing the need for prospective studies and careful selection by Michigan, and organ stewardship and maximizing benefits by Duke. The audience voted on criteria like argument, presentation, and responses. In a separate debate, the University of Southern California and the University of Chicago discussed mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for liver transplant candidates, with the University of Chicago proposing it due to the high risks of COVID-19 for candidates and vaccine efficacy, while the University of Southern California opposed it, highlighting patient urgency and disparities in vaccine access. The debate emphasized patient-centered care and ethics of vaccine mandates, leading the University of Chicago to win with 66% of the vote, showcasing critical thinking and communication skills on a timely topic.

Keywords

Liver Meeting

academic debates

intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

liver transplantation

tumor selection criteria

survival rates

COVID-19 vaccination

transplant candidates

vaccine efficacy

patient-centered care

vaccine mandates